So I assume Trump will keep trying to tariff other things and causing economic damage.
The EU has been far too accomodating to Trump because of the situation with Ukraine. Trump is exploiting this, but at a certain point he will have over-played his hand.
The EU has the ability to really hit back when it comes to US services exports, but that would definitely be a nuclear option.
They have run down their inventories and/or they have absorbed losses as much as was economically possible (driven by political reasons). Now they have no choice but to raise prices, either by shrinkflation, enshitification, or just straight up price increases.
I’ve been wondering about that. Would that be just “I don’t want to piss off Trump” or would it be the more oblivious “he must know what he’s doing, let’s try to stick it out” or even the “I don’t want to admit that the liberals were completely right on this”?
There is one sector of population that is pro bankruptcy- the very wealthy.
When those farmers, home owners, and small businesses fold, the real assets simply change owners, thats what bankputcy is all about. The farmland doesn’t disappear. It just changes hands.
It goes to those that have the liquidity to buy it. Most often the creditor.
I think if that sticks, the courts will have saved Trump from himself.
Leave the tariffs in and we’ve got inflation for the midterms. Being forced to reverse them avoids that while also giving Trump a chance to blame all economic problems on the courts.
Maybe they should have considered the legal aspects beforehand!
Earlier on Friday, Bloomberg reported that the administration, worried the court might invalidate the tariffs immediately, filed statements by Scott Bessent, the treasury secretary, Howard Lutnick, the commerce secretary, and Marco Rubio, the secretary of state, warning that such a decision would be a “dangerous diplomatic embarrassment” for the US.
I’m not sure. If it’s in Congress’s hands rather than Trump’s, then I’d think it’s more straightforward for other countries to target congressional districts in retaliation.