Random Political Thoughts

MAGA would explode if Trump did this.

Our President was having his red carpet time at the same time as your PM. Trump’s was for the private screening of Melania. Doubt if Melania got as big a hug as the gay hockey player actor got from Carney!

Trying to change other settings in Outlook, I noticed that there is a function to revise your emails to cut out ā€œsensitive geopolitical referencesā€, and you can differentiate the editor settings by language:

Did you turn it on and type ā€œGulf of….ā€?

1 Like

Huh, actually it seems like American English finds none of the following ā€œsensitiveā€:

Guessing this is more used in China, etc. at present.

I could not see the sense in Charles’ visit anyway.

I figure Trump loved the state visit with the King at Windsor Castle. He really likes pomp and circumstance when he is the guest.

IMO, that’s the reason for Charles’ invite to the US. Trump likes peer-to-peer hosting between two kings.

I’m sure he really, really wants that ballroom completed so he can show it off in these events. I wonder how many visits he will squeeze in between the time it opens and the time he leaves office. (of course, assuming he is replaced by an Republican, he will get many later invitations)

For a while now it seems like all visits have been mainly ā€œSee, we’re trying and I’m not the d*ckā€ visits.

For no reason in particular this morning, I find myself thinking about how the real thing that damns America is extreme polarization.

I wonder how many otherwise/formerly non-lost-causes were driven to the punch bowl of MAGA Kool Aid because they were turned off by someone on the left who spoiled a bit of (perhaps naĆÆvely) well-intentioned fun because they felt obliged to damn that fun in that moment.

Sounds like trolling to me, but, OK, what exactly do you mean by Republican well-intentioned fun? I was tempted to follow this with a long list of things the Republicans have done that clearly are neither well-intentioned (wrt Democrats, that is) nor fun, but I’ll just listen instead.

I was referring to someone throwing cold water upon Chuck Norris jokes last week because Chuck Norris had some pretty horrible beliefs / because Chuck Norris jokes are a manifestation of certain aspects of modern American culture that don’t need to be celebrated.

Those criticisms are certainly valid, but the world isn’t a black-and-white place. Inappropriate humor made (perhaps naively) without malice still brings joy to a world that needs it. Discretion should be used when dampening it due to the likely negative reaction to having joy spoiled.

In my sphere of communication, I only saw a handful of conservatives being angry about leftists apparently being angry about Chuck Norris.

I saw one socialist, Millennial friend among leftists post a Chuck Norris meme and nobody got mad at it.

Of leftists I saw discussing it, it was mostly, ā€œIn retrospect he had some gross beliefs, but the memes were funny.ā€ Didn’t see much grieving, but nobody seemed to care? I’m sure on like Twitter there are still ongoing fights.

3 Likes

OK, yeah. So I didn’t understand M_S’s comment at all because I literally heard none of the damning of the fun. Sorry. I also thought the memes were funny, fwiw.

2 Likes

I’ve seen a lot of assholes use the line ā€œI was just jokingā€ to excuse some really shitty comments.

1 Like

I haven’t actually encountered anyone reacting to Chuck Norris’s death in one way or another. Maybe I need to go digging through my Facebook feed, but it seems like mostly a non-event.

1 Like

the only place i had seen it was a TCM Facebook group

True, but I think that Chuck Norris memes transcend ā€œ:poop:y commentsā€.

You know, it occurs to me that if I were serving on our Glorious Leader’s cabinet, and were either anticipating being fired or wanted to retire…and if I wanted a nice financial parachute…

1 Like

Something familiar about the fired and expected-to-be fired people. Just can’t put my hand on it and grab…

I figure Gabbard is next.

She wasn’t able to lie like Trump wanted as she was under oath.

With Trump, being 99.9% loyal doesn’t matter. He will only focus on that 0.1%.