Something you might find interesting.
Not so much. Iâve heard that Trump is evil, so itâs what I would expect. Kamala Harris is a pioneer, someone to look up to.
In what way?
In what way is he evil? Itâs just what people say.
That isnât the post I was responding to. Here you go:
People are saying, lots of people, the best people.
I found the way she addressed teenagers unusual.
Telling them not to let other people define them?
I guess that would be unusual if you wanted to indoctrinate someone into a cult.
That would be âwhat she said to the teenagersâ.
You posted a link to an article that claimed the VPOTUSâs actions were a âcringeworthy stuntâ, so yes, someone said Iâm supposed to cringe, which is close enough to the same thing that Iâm not interested in splitting hairs.
But there is no explanation of why anything is cringeworthy.
âcringeâ and âbeing upsetâ are pretty distinct reactions.
So what did you find unusual?
Fine⌠why should I cringe?
Or more precisely, why was the video a âcringeworthy stuntâ?
Do you agree or disagree?
If you disagree, why did you post the link?
He ignored it when I ask, I doubt youâll be any different.
1 Like
It was not the way a person would usually address a teenager. Much of it seemed like the way a person would address a much younger person. So it was unusual.
As I said before, I didnât write the article. Someone else wrote the article, and his editor provided the linkâs text.
Without saying whether or not I disagree with the authorâs editor on the cringe-worthiness, as I have said, I found the link interesting.
I found it interesting too. Nice to see a VP giving kids a positive message for a change.
2 Likes
Iâm sorry, are you feeling left out?
Are you a trained monkey? Or is this a Pavlovian thing?
Not particularly. Just pointing out your general refusal to answer a direct questions. Like whether you found it cringe worthy or not which youâve ignored once and evaded once.
1 Like