We currently have negligible EV car production in Canada so there is no sacrifice in letting the Chinese EVs in. Would much rather see that than spending billions in subsidies to US car makers for minimal jobs
It’s a waste of time and energy.
Citibank believes in Canada:
**Citibank plans Canadian expansion, new hiring as it seeks to capitalize on shifting global trade
Canadian unit is expanding its business in the country by hiring staff and onboarding more clients, as the U.S. lender seeks to capitalize Canada’s “once-in-a-generation opportunity” as global trade routes are redrawn.
As the Liberal government seeks to unwind Canada’s trade dependency on the U.S. as well as hike spending for defence and infrastructure projects, more Canadian companies are expanding globally while multinational corporations are looking to do more business in Canada, according to Citibank Canada’s new chief executive officer Raymond Gatcliffe.
“It’s about that realization that they have to make a strategic pivot to ensure continued and consistent growth. The diversification point is one that everybody is acknowledging,” Mr. Gatcliffe said in an interview Thursday.**
And here’s us with a PhD in economics as prime minister, to direct all of this. I expect that he’s coordinating a lot of this stuff behind the scenes based on economic principles.
Maybe not. But I hope so.
Although less than with gas cars.
And here’s us with a PhD in economics as prime minister, to direct all of this. I expect that he’s coordinating a lot of this stuff behind the scenes based on economic principles.
Maybe not. But I hope so.
He does appear to be masterfully wearing two separate hats at present.
Would seem like a no-brainer to remove coffee tariffs.
I have been assured that since America can produce coffee, we don’t need foreign coffee.
I’ve heard people make proposals they thought were serious that would result in most of Hawaii being used just for coffee.
When does the smuggling business begin?
I’m betting shortly after the Tomahawk-on-sight regime ends.
I don’t think it’s the EV market in particular they’re protect so much as the car market in general. If their cars are as cheap as I’m hearing, they’d hurt North America manufacturers a ton where they’re so much cheaper and they’ve already given up on making cars due to profit margins.
With all these trips and meetings, it seems like it. Poilievre’s claiming he’s doing nothing. Negotiations don’t happen instantaneously.
Just need more global warming to grow more coffee here.
Have Iowa Soybean farmers considered growing coffee?
Trump having a hissy fit and cancelling trade talks with Canada because Ontario ads point out Reagan disliked tariffs.
The ad will be carried in the US during the first game of the World Series tonight so that should excite Trump further. There is no misrepresentation of Reagan’s view of tariffs so happy the ad is not being pulled.
There is no misrepresentation of Reagan’s view of tariffs so happy the ad is not being pulled.
Reagan is increasingly a RINO in the lexicon of the modern Republican party. Although he shared certain ideals with the modern party, he also seemed pretty damn patriotic and intelligent. Not welcome traits today.
I’m not sure if this ad will do much anymore. Reagan also made immigrants into citizens.
The Ontario Premier who commissioned the ad is an old time conservative so is a Reagan fan. I think he is hoping to appeal to that segment of the Republican Party. The ad also tries to be educational but that approach may not work on MAGA types.
The Ontario Premier who commissioned the ad is an old time conservative so is a Reagan fan
President - % increase in national debt
Franklin D. Roosevelt 791.8%
Woodrow Wilson 789.9%
Ronald Reagan 160.8%
George W. Bush 72.6%
Barack Obama 64.4%
George H. W. Bush 42.3%
Donald Trump (first term) 39.2%
Richard Nixon 34.3%
LOL so WWI, WW2, Obama who inherited the Bush crash and a bunch of supposedly conservative Republican occupy the largest expansion of US debt by percent with Reagan by far the father of exploding US debt without world war.
The only conservatism the Republican Party has had in the past 50 years has been the social kind.
The only conservatism the Republican Party has had in the past 50 years has been the social kind.
Your awkward and uncomfortable truths are valid in Canada as well. I believe that any periods in recent history of fiscal conservatism, the liberals have been running the country. Conservatives just spend money.
They both spend money like drunken sailors, though sometimes on different things, but only the liberals make some attempt to try and pay for it.
It’s simple. Canada is not buckling in the talks to get a bad trade deal the way that other countries have. Just wish those other countries had pushed back more.
**Kevin Hassett, the director of Trump’s National Economic Council, told reporters at the White House on Friday that Trump’s post cancelling the talks “reveals his frustration with the actions and postures of the Canadians through months of negotiations.”
“The Canadians have been very difficult to negotiate with,” he said.
“You look at all the countries around the world that we’ve made deals with, and the fact that we’re now negotiating with Mexico separately, reveals that it’s not just about one ad, that there’s frustration that’s built up,” he added.
Trump is going to lose his tariff case.
Look at what he just did:
Donald Trump said he was adding an additional 10 per cent levy on Canadian exports to the US, escalating a fight with America’s northern neighbour that was sparked by a television advert quoting Ronald Reagan on tariffs.
Trump announced the tariff increase as he travelled to Malaysia on Air Force One on Saturday, in a move that will increase tensions with Mark Carney, the former central banker elected prime minister of Canada this year.
The US president on Thursday night abruptly cancelled trade talks with Canada because the province of Ontario had launched a US ad campaign citing former president Reagan’s criticism of tariffs.