im right there with you this week (except not hating it). gotta scramble some progress on a few things so I can post in the usual Friday thread in good conscience
RN
you must be in leadership. congratulations, you worked yourself out of an actual job into a role babysitting those who do stuff. welcome to the club. it sucks for those of us who find joy in being good at something.
Thatās the thing about having career ambition. You find yourself in a position where youāre doing crap you donāt want to do, and not doing the things you used to like about your job.
This year, one of our goals was required to be a career advancement goal. My career advancement goal is to not get promoted, and not get fired. Which is completely valid. My name isnāt Peter.
I got accepted to the Amazon vine program. Order stuff for free in exchange for a review.
I thought Iād do it a bit, do a review then sell crap on marketplace.
Unsure how much Iāll do before I canāt be bothered.
People should be 100% allowed to do this. I had an analyst once, she was an absolute rock star. Iād give her two days worth of work and she would do it in five hours and she didnāt make mistakes.
But she hated meetings and had zero interest in anything close to management. I had to shield her a bit from senior leaders who wanted to make her into something else. Donāt ruin her, folks, she is the best analyst Iāve got.
Good for her if thatās what she wanted. Hopefully you paid her well. My experience from back in the day was rock stars tended to just get more rocks and the unspendable adulation from the bosses.
I had to go into the office today, and I only survived about 3 hours there before I decided to come back home (the reason I had to go into the office was fulfilled by that point). I have few meetings on Mondays, and none of my immediate colleagues go in that day, so itās difficult to stay there when I could come home and multitask instead.
If youāre going to mistype an āfā, āGoof luck!ā is definitely the preferred ytpo.
I wonder which is worse . . .
Getting a summons for jury duty . . .
or getting a witness subpoena to appear in court.
As someone who has recently been questioned and crossed on the standā¦ Iāll take jury duty any day.
Depends on why youāre being summoned as a witness.
From worst to least horrible, partly conjecture:
-
Testify about crime you are accused of committing
-
Testify about a civil matter to which you are a party
-
Testify about crime someone else is accused of committing
-
Testify about a civil matter to which you are not a party
-
Jury duty involving icky violent encounter
-
Jury duty about any other matter
There may be some overlap with 4 & 5.
lol that bad?
I only saw witnesses and the accused cross-examined and it was pretty tame (I was in the jury).
This was in the UK though. Probably more adversarial in the US.
It is that bad when itās your own, very contentious divorce.
I donāt think Iāll look at jury duty the same again.
Iāve been on 3 juries (trial lengths of 4 hours, 3 days, and 5 days) and never found it a problematic experience.
The jury selection is very flawed when 4 & 5 overlap.
Iāve been on only one jury (less than a full day, criminal trial). Did not enjoy at all, would prefer not to repeat, but would be willing to.
Last time I was summoned I was honestly able to decline due to a previously scheduled vacation. (Or possibly even more recently I had the opportunity to decline for being over 70? Not sure if thatās an option at all, or that I used it, but I would use if now if itās available.)
I mean the degree of awfulness overlaps. The easiest case where youāre testifying as a third party witness on a civil matter is probably less horrible than the worst day where youāre hearing or deliberating on a gruesome criminal matter as a juror.
Not that you would be involved in 4 and 5 on the same caseā¦ thatās obviously not allowed.
Like if I had to testify as an expert witness on the difference between Uniform Distribution of Death and Constant Force of Mortality - even considering that Iād be cross-examined by a lawyer who wouldnāt know what he was talking about - thatās still probably better than spending the day as a juror looking at gruesome photos of a young child who was raped and tortured.
He knows, thatās the joke.