In fairness, Memphis has had a crime problem since the 1960’s. It’s reasonable to think the city needs additional resources.
However, I don’t think having National Guard troops stationed around high-visibility/touristy areas, looking bored or picking up trash are the resources the city needs.
Groups named in the article to be targeted: a group created by George Soros, who is not the largest Democratic donor by a large margin, but is one of the largest Jewish Democratic donors, the Southern Poverty Law Center, which specializes in civil rights, and the Ford Foundation. None of the problematic statements that I have seen about Kirk come from any of those groups or their leadership.
Filming/posting videos of agents isn’t doxxing, but going a step further and publicizing the identities in the venues where the information is likely to incite harassment certainly is.
Of course, there’s a fine line there in the sense that folks wrongfully detained or improperly treated while detained have a valid reason to name their assailants in civil suits, and that information is generally public…
Trump is suing the NYT for more than its market cap for being a Democratic mouthpiece. This is after the Times has largely been sanewashing Trump, and ignores the first amendment and existence of FoxNews.
The case will invariably be thrown out. Just Trump being a bully.
If Trump truly longs for the early days of the US he should remember that newspapers then were almost always just mouthpieces for one party or another.
I haven’t tracked recent money flows, but with his legal woes pre-election one of his PACs was covering his legal bills. I suspect that that’s still the case. If not…the market value of Truth Social, his profit from crypto, etc. certainly provide a windfall to use in paying legal fees.
I don’t understand the full political campaign law gymnastics, but my takeaway is that mode of financing was at least plausibly legal given how US campaign finance laws work and given the structure of the PAC in question.