Then I guess it is not worthy of my time. Nor anyone else’s IMO. I’m not the demographic (GOP), so MO is moot.
1 Like
Commentary on the subject that caused me to post this here rather than in the ICE thread: Records Show Trump DOJ Forced to Drop Cases Against LA Protesters Due to Federal Agents' Lies | Common Dreams
1 Like
Kind of afraid to ask, but what is that picture supposed to be? Some kind of weapon or restraint device?
I couldn’t make it out, so I decided that maybe it was just supposed to be “darkness”. Which is dumb, as the darkness does seem to be an ally here.
Top Generals Nominated for New Positions Must Now Meet With Trump
The move is a departure from past practice and has raised worries that it could lead to the politicization of the military’s top ranks.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/29/us/politics/generals-trump.html
Geez. Who writes this stuff? Of course it IS the politicization of the military’s top ranks. There’s no “could lead” about it.
1 Like
Trump is just following the playbook.
1 Like
People who don’t want to spend millions defending lawsuits or fighting politically motivated government “oversight”.
The evidence submitted proving Bove told officials to ignore judicial rulings he didn’t like was mysteriously “lost” by the DOJ for months, and only found right before the vote to confirm him.
Still wondering where the “treason” part is, since most of the allegations are when Obama was still President and some before the elections.
The goal, she insisted, was to make Trump’s election win appear illegitimate, thus laying the basis of a “years-long coup against him”.
And talking about the President (tRump) isn’t treasonous, at least…in the USA…I know.
Surprised she didn’t include, “leading to tRump’s loss in the 2020 election, so TREASON!”
But, there is a catch there. Can’t say that “Trump lost”.
She needs to say “Making it close enough that the Ds could steal the election.”
1 Like
We don’t have to worry about white nationalist terrorism any more, as they are running the show. It’s not terrorism if the government does it.
What kind of unscrupulous person would spend years casting doubt on an election that they knew to be legitimate?
The projection is blinding.
As usual, every allegation is a confession.
1 Like
Mentioning Trump’s impeachments is now verboten
https://www.washingtonpost.com/entertainment/2025/07/31/trump-impeachment-smithsonian/?utm_campaign=wp_main&utm_medium=social&utm_source=bluesky
I agree with others that this belongs in this thread.
The firing has now happened. Scary stuff.
The departmental commissioner for the CPI number will be gone when that number goes sour.
2 Likes
Yep. I’m sure Trump is taking notes.
1 Like