I think a better analogy would be a package store, or a smoke shop, both of which might have community resistance to being placed too close to a school.
1 Like
Are there any states that permit a consume on-site dispensary model? That would seem like a bar, rather than package store. They get all pissy if you crack a beer while waiting in line, or so a friend tells me.
In our city the main complaint has been the odor from the farms. A bunch of small farms switched from growing flowers to growing marijuana and the neighbors raised a big stink.
1 Like
You mean the farms created a big stink, and the neighbors complained. 
1 Like
âThe three words that best describe that town are as follows and I quoteâŚâ
2 Likes
fyi, my BIL grows cannabis, and you can smell his 6 plants from quite a distance away.
I can also smell the cows from the farm a mile away when the wind blows a certain way, which has been all spring long this year.
1 Like
You might be cranky if your neighbor switched from growing flowers to dairy farming, too. On my suburban lot, Iâm allowed to plant pretty much whatever flowers i want, but there are a lot of rules about livestock, largely because livestock can be a nuisance for the neighbors.
Of course, bambooâŚ
3 Likes
Minnesota currently allows hemp-derrived delta-9 THC products (same exact chemical as what is in cannabis based THC).
Most bars serve THC tonics/seltzers (and also edibles) that you can consume on premises.
So, not exactly a dispensary.
Most local micro/craft brewers also have a THC tonic/seltzer.
NIMBY is not allowing something that would be good for your community but would devalue your property so you protect your properties value over the rest of the community. Prohibition of a vice is not really fitting this Paradym for me.
This statement gets at the root for why prohibitions of dispensaries feels like NIMBYism to some.
Many of the folks who would like increased access to cannabis dispensaries donât see cannabis use as a vice.
1 Like
But âeasyâ access to cannabis isnât generally viewed as a social good in the same manner as having adequate housing would be.
1 Like
Exactly. Access to weed is not the same as nuclear power, affordable housing, homeless services, new roads, etc.
1 Like
Iâm guessing those arenât the people who are trying to get it zoned out of their towns, though. A lot of people DO see cannabis as a vice, and I think itâs those people who are generally trying to restrict it.
Basically, Iâm suggesting that:
- Most of the people who donât view restricting cannabis dispensaries would reject the notion that such restrictions are NIMBYism because they view cannabis use as a vice (akin to alcohol or smoking); while
- People who disagree with the notion of cannabis use being a vice are more likely to consider municipal restrictions as NIMBYness.
To frame it differently:
- Is it âNIMBYâ to prohibit a package store or a smoke shop in a particular neighborhood/municipality?
- Is it âNIMBYâ to prohibit a pharmacy, grocery store, or plant shop in a particular neighborhood/municipality?
- If the answer to the two prior questions were ânoâ and âyesâ⌠then I would conjecture that the answer to the question, âis it âNIMBYâ to prohibit a cannabis dispensaryâŚâ can be predicted by how cannabis use is viewed.
I think itâs NIMBY to want the liquor store convenient to your home, but not too close. And to want a new prison, but not in your town. I donât think itâs NIMBY to think liquor stores should be outlawed, and also not want one near your home.
So thereâs probably a mix. Maybe some of the people who donât want a dispensary on the street corner want one a couple miles away, so they can buy their weed. You can accuse those people of NIMBYism. But i think most of the people who object to dispensaries also object to legalized weed. Which is a different issue, best described by something other than âNIMBYâ.
3 Likes
If you are not opposed to something, but donât want it in your neighborhood thatâs NIMBY.
If you oppose something and also donât want it in your neighborhood, thatâs not nimby.
So in this case anyone who is NOT opposed to MJ sales but donât want the dispensary in their neighborhood would be NIMBY.
Someone who says âwe should build more prisons, but not hereâ is classic NIMBY as is someone who says, âwe should build more high density housing, but not hereâ, itâs no different than âweed should be legal, but we donât need to be selling it where I can smell itâ
2 Likes
Curious on your take for the situation where someone doesnât like the smell of weed at all.
Should they then be opposed to having the substance available at all in order to not be viewed as part of the NIMBY crowd?
Not sure. Iâd guess not all NIMBY is bad NIMBY. Iâm sure Iâve been guilty of NIMBY plenty of times. I mean I love bacon, but I donât want a pig farm in my neighborhood.
1 Like