i don’t think it’s baiting people. they can remain civil, but they choose not to. this guy’s first few posts while totally insulting somehow was deemed okay by the fb gods. then his 3rd was finally censored.
Are we sure the hobby is new though
1 Like
well, prior to this, you could insult people on facebook with zero repercussions, so it was a different playing field in an anything goes environment vs now. it has changed recently.
Why would you want to be part of a community where people insult each other?
You must be new here. 
2 Likes
fyi, we consider that baiting here. Just so you know.
You consider what baiting? I didnt tell you what I even said. Are you psychic for what I said? 
Why is lucy assuming i was baiting when I did not mention what I said?
if you are trying to annoy people enough that they break the rules, that’s baiting. And yes, we aren’t psychic, we make our best guess.
I meant “psychic” for what I said on facebook. You did not see it nor did i tell you, so how the hell do you know it was baiting?
What you described was obviously baiting. Either you were baiting, or you did a poor job describing what you were doing.
You have no freaking clue what I said to claim it was baiting
The bolded is pretty much the definition of baiting.
2 Likes
No it isnt without context of the conversation. Simply responding to a person who was baiting me is not baiting
“Wait for them to go outside the rules” would be border line. “Get them to” is baiting
I thought their initial post was insulting to begin with. Answering that to defend myself and they continue to say exactly what they already were but with words that apparently catch the censor this time ain’t baiting
You did not freaking see the conversation to have any possible educated opinion on this
Maybe we’re baiting about baiting!? 
1 Like
Yes lucy and soyleche are right now
Like I said - it may just be that you did a poor job of explaining what you were doing. What you described was baiting.
No it wasn’t. Without context of what was said it wasnt