That’s the problem. I expect they will be competent enough to drop enforcement of any regulations that donors don’t like. Also, use the DOJ to investigate and prosecute anyone on the enemies list.
They will also be competent enough to push tax cuts through congress in spite of the $2 trillion deficit.
Trump 1.0’s lack of experience, as well as lack of preparation for potential victory, led him to rely on mainstream GOP mechanisms to identify (and vet) potential appointees.
Therefore we got adults whom I might have disagreed with, but who at least had some potential to keep the government functioning and resist problematic orders.
Trump 2.0 has experience, a network, and years of information identifying folks with that critical trait of loyalty. Also, in the past 9 years, Trump & co. have taken over large swaths of GOP infrastructure.
And, of course, the Heritage Foundation has been amassing a database of candidates as part of Project 2025. (I’m not certain how many of the headline grabbing folks are the result of Project 2025, but the folks further down, not subject to Senate confirmation…)
Even if it was 5:00 PM local time and the beers were cold and had only been sitting out 5-10 minutes he was on his way out anyway… who stands there and drinks a whole bunch of beers by himself in front of his coworkers?
I could maybe see saying “hey guys who wants to help me dispose of this beer as a courtesy to Fox ?”
If he has touched a drop since he was nominated then I don’t really believe him. Promising a change in a drinking habit becaue someone else expects it sounds like guaranteed failure.
David Perdue named Ambassador to China. Perdue spent most of his career as a turnaround specialist that outsourced jobs to China among other countries. He also made a mint insider trading while in the Senate. He’s was a Big Lie booster and is a Trump loyalist.