I decided to look into this because I obviously love to nerd out about sports. My analysis is incomplete, but the first thing to jump out at me was this:
Now at the risk of stating the obvious… it seems a little disingenuous to call that a consensus pick for Washington.
I would argue that the consensus called for a tie. As such the consensus is 6-9-1 which is a little better than 6-10.
I will update if I notice anything else that seems worthy of pointing out.
I should add that I am fully supportive of a rule precluding US from calling ties as that would just overwhelm the poor intern.
But when there are an even number of players and we are evenly split on a game then it seems like considerations ought to be made in the consensus standings.
I don’t think so; since we’re not allowed to pick a tie; so I don’t think that “consensus” should be allowed to pick, either (especially if it’s a “competing” entry).
Defaulting to the home team seems like a reasonable tie breaker.
There’s no crying in baseball.
There are no ties in the consensus picks.
Like my heart for every girl I had a crush on during high school, ties must be broken.
I’d also point out that if the “consensus” was allowed to have ties (while we didn’t), there’d be near zero chance of anyone correlating perfectly with “consensus”.
Also, there’s a reason why I put quotes on “competing” in my prior post. That entry just isn’t eligible for prizes (so the next player in line gets to claim it).
Simul eustis et pecatur. It is both an entry and informational-only.
Even if zConsensus leads the standings, it won’t win the game.
OTOH, it’s taking up the space of that place so it’s not inconceivable to assign it that number for finishing…and hand the trophy to someone with a soul.
In fact if someone correlated perfectly with the consensus and there was a tie in the consensus pre-tie-breaker, then I would argue that this player didn’t correlate perfectly with the consensus.
But if we’re picking 272 games now… the chances of perfect correlation are basically nil anyway.
TLDR: that’s a feature, not a bug. Plus it’ll never happen.
[quote="1695814, post:191, topic:]
There’s no crying in baseball.
There are no ties in the consensus picks.
Like my heart for every girl I had a crush on during high school, ties must be broken.
[/quote]
We still think you are an ok person, and an excellent mod.
Yes, and I think your COFP have gained a little of the COVID-19…you should exercise them…after you speak with your doctor before starting a new exercise program.
I don’t normally post news from around the league, but, every now and then, I’ll stick something in here. Don’t expect a ticker and, further, expect what I do post to be biased for NFC North teams (esp GB & MN)
Courtesy of Mr Hoffman:
Something to keep in mind as you consider your COFPs.