Today. I Didn't Learn (Duolingo Spanish help, please)

Allegedly I learned. I did a lesson, and did it completely correctly. But I had almost no idea what was going on. Almost all of the questions were “filll in the blanks”, with just two blanks and two words, (which could be used twice, even if I wanted to). So it amounted to which word went in which blank.

They were all on a topic I had seen before, but which also hadn’t been explained then: “compounding” a verb with the object pronoun(s). And in all these cases, one blank always had the object separate. In fact, in each question the form with the object separate was the first blank. (That was somewhat necessary, so that you would know the antecedent in the compounded version). But I frequently had no understanding.

That one I understood somewhat, but in the first sentence is “se” him and “la” it (referring to la pelota, the ball)? And is it just soccer knowledge that in the second sentence, the “him” to whom it is passed is your teammate, not the goalkeeper?

Oops. I didn’t same the translation. What are the components of the compound verb, and what does it mean? (I think it was the “se” that was most confusing, though I was separately a little confused by “al pertero” vaguely feeling that should be “to the goalkeeper”, which is certainly not where you want to kick it.

Until I saw the translation, I was confused by the “le passs” expecting (maybe from some ancient French influence) that it would be “pass him”, and then wondering how she could kick it. So is “le” here an indirect object that can mean either "him’ or “her”?

Again, I’m not really understanding “se”, either separate from the verb or compounded into the verb. And is the intent here that we are kicking the ball to our own goalkeeper or past the opponent’s goalkeeper?

I actually understood that one pretty well. But “will catch”? Is this future tense? Or present tense but future meaning (at least in English)?

Gracias.

Like I said, all correct, but at least 8 compounded verb + object, none of which I could have compounded if they had just given me to English and asked me to express it in Spanish and some of which I didn’t even understand after being sure which of the two given Spanish words I wanted. This after over 1000 lessons (normally only one lesson per day).

The se is a conversion from le since Spanish doesn’t permit “lela”. The se and a él represent the same person, the indirect object in the English “Pass him the ball”. The repeat of the pronoun by the noun clarifies what se means. And yes you probably wouldn’t encourage kicking the ball directly to the goalie. Maybe a looser translation of toward or at. Maybe even not what a native speaker fluent in soccer would say, but what do I know.

The if present then present is known as a zero conditional. It it used when the then is sure to happen. First conditional uses present future like English. If you study, then you will pass. There is also a present imperative combination.

Help from my retired Spanish teacher mom.

2 Likes