Can YT be picked again?
YT and MA both passed W.
But I trust YT more because MA went first and almost always would pick W anyway.
Can YT be picked again?
YT and MA both passed W.
But I trust YT more because MA went first and almost always would pick W anyway.
YT cannot be picked right now since he was in last government
No, you can’t be in 2 governments in a row.
I can’t be in this government
I’m ok with this logic.
So if claims have been true the council deck “should be” 3 Wraiths and 2 Rings.
I’m good with this.
I got those numbers as well. Which gives me a 10% chance of WWW a 10% chance of RRW and 80% WWR.
Still waiting on JB’s answer. I will want to try to get more information for a soon to be Sauron. Want data before I pick which one to nominate.
This is a wasted question when it’s posed to IPD.
Yes you can. But YT can’t in this situation.
Why???
IPD plays by a secret set of rules understood only by IPD (and it’s arguable how well it’s really understood by IPD).
Why the Nay IPD?
Don’t trust YT. But seems like if there was a hobbit in the pack of BF/JB/YT (likely) none of them had the guts to start a conflict.
IPD plays by a secret set of rules understood only by IPD
I play to win
JB what were you given in order? Did it match BF’s claim?
RRW. It matched.
I don’t think naying everything is the way to victory…
It is if you are filthy hobbit and you know there were more rings than wraiths in the deck.
I nominate JSM
To explain my thinking here. JSM was given RR so we have no information and is due to be Sauron soon. We have information on MH, BF, JB, and YT. MA passed W, but on the 1st round. That makes it a standard play for both sides. Not much information there, but better than nothing.
Is it worth it to consider failing 3 govt’s in a row, given that based on “truth” tellers we have many wraiths left?
We have 3 out of 5W. I’d rather get the W for sure unless this government is dirty as hell over a 40% shot of getting a R, but I could see why a hobbit might want that 40% shot of not falling behind.