Random Thoughts

I think JW Marriott was Mormon. Yup, teh interwebz says so.

2 Likes

Ahh…makes sense then. Thanks.

2 Likes

Interesting, thanks. I found out from the article that Mitt Romney (first name Willard) was named after him as he was a family friend.

1 Like

this was a mystery that was solved as quickly as I expected. Marriott.

1 Like

an old neighbor of mine is currently on a Netflix reality show/competition. (I’ve not watched it - million dollar secret.)

Among all people I have known, i think they are first tier (if not first overall) for most likely to be on a reality show.

1 Like

There is an opening on another team (corporate actuarial, not an area I’ve worked in before) that would be a lateral move for me.

It’s not a team I’m interested in per se, and I don’t feel ready to move on from this role yet, but I’m bracing myself for the ā€œwhy aren’t you applying?ā€ conversations. It seems that if you’re smart and capable, you’re expected to apply for pretty much everything that’s reasonably within reach. And if you don’t, it raises eyebrows. Don’t love it.

:bighug: Why are you expected to apply for lateral moves? Would it at least come with a pay increase?

there’s the answer. why aren’t you applying for roles that are demotions? same reason.

but if it is a slight promotion (using title or money or whatever), practice your answers on us. we love practice

2 Likes

Pro tip: try to come off as smart or capable, but not both. I’m doing great with this approach!

2 Likes

Because being well rounded is valued far above being an expert in something.

It would not be a pay increase, no. Internal lateral moves never are, as a policy here. Which definitely doesn’t make sense.

I’ve only been at this level for 9 months, so I’m not opposed to a lateral move as my next role, but it would need to be a role I actually wanted to do. For a role I DON’T want to do but am being told I need to apply for, it would have to come with a pay and title boost (and depending on the role, that may not be enough either).

I’ve seen where companies wanted smart, capable people to take on many lateral roles as a path to upper management.

1 Like

Well . . . tell them that you’ve not yet rounded this corner of your career . . .

I think they hope I aspire to be chief actuary or a CFO someday - the pool of potential successors is small. I want neither of those things, which I’ve communicated multiple times. I just want to like my job!

2 Likes

I agree. I just wonder if they think the stop she is on now is a ā€œ9 monthā€ kind of stop. Seems short to me, but I don’t have upper management written all over me.

1 Like

ā€œJob rotation will continue until employment satisfaction improves!ā€

3 Likes

On the one hand, I’ve been on this team for a while so the role comes easily to me. On the other hand, I haven’t mastered being an executive so 9 months doesn’t feel nearly long enough!

1 Like

having read more about the internal rotational feel (even among folks your level), i think the defense is you have not been in current role long enough to want to leave it - still learning and growing and improving in that role, it still feels fresh and challenging, etc.

basically, we are looking for the positive spin so it isn’t ā€œnoā€ or ā€œugh, i’d hate that.ā€ which might be true but creates tension.

3 Likes

yeah, but after 10 years of that they might catch on

3 Likes

we must win this battle to reach the next one. always delay the date on which they learn you lack the ambition they project onto you

1 Like