If the Punctuation Police were a thing, that post would be cited.
There was apparently a bet between GA and TX senators on the World Series where the loser had to wear the other team’s jersey. Ossoff played it well by having Cruz sport the Crime Dog
“Right-of-ways”?
Should be “rights-of-way” amirite?
According to this either is acceptable. Brings back memories of the grammarians on AO pointing out when to use whom instead of who although who has become accepted.
WHO has not become accepted by the anti-vaxxers.
Not grammarians, apparently.
Well, you can write it as if you were an idiot and write it as if your audience were idiots, or you could write it the right way.
Your choice, and you shall be judged accordingly.
Are you saying right of ways is not a correct (right) alternative to rights of way?
An alternative source:
However, in more specific contexts, the plural form can also be right of ways e.g. in reference to various types of right of ways or a collection of right of ways .
Are we reduced to debating a right rights alternative?
Some people seem to think it’s important as if we didn’t we would be treating the readers of these posts as idiots and we wouldn’t want to do that.
I’ll put this here since a lot of the “Let’s Go Brandon” comments are in this thread, but it really isn’t much for humor. It ought to scare each and every person living in this country, and the people who voted for him and continually prop him up need to apologize for their blunder.
I’m having a hard time believing that anyone would find that clip more than mildly interesting and maybe a bit amusing. That someone would think anyone should be “scared” by it boggles my mind.
That some classless douche bag would take a Christmas call to slip in a insult is pretty disgusting.
And Biden either not knowing or not acknowledging it was a huge plus in his column, IMO.
Seems more like an automatic polite response, like when I pick up take out, they say, “Hope you enjoy it” and I say, “You too.”



