“Many” is the operative word here, not “most” or “all”. “The church” is not a monolith.
But, I agree that those that make the papers seem to be more into hate than love.
All that said. Somebody above said we should get rid of tax deductions for religious organizations. I agree with that. And, it seems that 90% of the people who oppose abortion at fertilization do it from religious belief (however founded). They’re pushing to “establish religion” in my mind.
20 weeks is where it starts to feel wrong to me. Maybe it should be earlier, but up until that point, a fetus has 0 chance of survival outside of the woman.
After that… things happen and a mother’s life can be in jeopardy. While id like to say just make that an exception only thing, policing that becomes a nightmare of privacy issues. At that point I don’t think abortion as a true choice is all that common, it is more of a last resort. Maybe I am wrong on that. We don’t ban guns because a lot of people use them for the wrong reason each year. We have to accept some slack in the system.
Debating on when life begins, if it is at conception, vs 6 weeks when a heart beat can be detected, or some point later - those all seem perfectly fine personal or religious views, but they aren’t great for writing laws.
So I find it hard to really say anything other than we should work to educate and reduce the need for abortions, but otherwise restricting them legally is counterproductive.
I was surprised when i read an article that pointed out that property rights aren’t mentioned in the constitution, either. Like privacy rights, they’ve been inferred.
Unlike privacy rights, they aren’t in much danger of being thrown out. Because the “originalists” aren’t, they just oppose rights for the oppressed.
They are explicitly mentioned in both the fourth amendment (protection against unreasonable search & seizure) and the fifth amendment (protection against being deprived of property without due process of law, also requires just compensation for property taken for eminent domain). The seventh amendment guarantees the right to a jury in civil matters.
So yeah, there is mention of property rights in the Constitution.
I’m going to say that protection against search and seizure applies pretty much exactly the same to “privacy” and to “property”. It is the right to be left alone.
The protection from the state taking your property without compensation is extremely narrow, and doesn’t speak to the broader issue. It’s like not having to put up troops in your home. And the right to a jury isn’t about property, at least, not explicitly.
The right to not be deprived of property without due process seems pretty important, and fairly similar wording to what’s in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
I don’t know how an IUD doesn’t expose a woman or physician to legal liability under this law. It’s similar to the texas law, but applies starting at conception.
: the termination of a pregnancy after, accompanied by, resulting in, or closely followed by the death of the embryo or fetus: such as
a : spontaneous expulsion of a human fetus during the first 12 weeks of gestation
Our second pregnancy was technically an aborted pregnancy; but we usually tell others it was a miscarriage to make it clear that it wasn’t our choice that the pregnancy ended.