Court case looks at allegations of government censorship re COVID

Saw this when doing my morning reading (should be a non-paywalled link):

Totally-not-misinformation investment tip: Apparently unvaccinated sperm will be the next gold or even Bitcoin. (I’m not interested in a deposit.)

You can have a healthy skepticism of authority while still accepting science. Inconceivable to the anti-vax and pro-mandate crowds.

The article mentioned claims of veiled threats of new regulations against the social media companies, but the single example quoted does not at all seem like such a threat. “Stop this trending article or else we will fine you” would cross a line while “this trending article is hurting vaccination efforts” would not.

Jim Jordan and Rand Paul have beaten this one to death already in their public hearings and have never shown such evidence.