You don't mess with the Zohran

The lesson from Clinton is to run charismatic candidates. The lesson from Harris is to not run far left wing, especially after the supposedly moderate goes left after election

All at a federal level of course, state and local is very different

I think the bigger lesson from Harris is to understand that when the current President’s approval rating is going down, you don’t prop him up more.

If her messaging was something other* than “do the same thing as Biden”, I would’ve voted for her.

* and not run too “far left” . . . to your point. However, it wasn’t “left side” talking points that threw me off.

Harris far left wing? She brought republican after republican on stage to endorse her. Non-MAGA republicans but very much republicans and non far left.

5 Likes

I’d agree not anything close to 50%, but I feel the Progressive wing is growing rapidly, especially among youth. Would be interested about any studies on it. They have local dominance in areas, now.

Not sure if I’m misunderstanding? I think I’ve only heard Harris described as “far left wing” by the Fox News/OANN-sphere, where every Democrat is the most far-left Communist radical liberal Marxist ever run.

5 Likes

Agreed.
Scary politics win the stupid vote. That and her vagina.

She also has a funny laugh and that became something people would list in their reasons why they didn’t want her to be President.

I think Harris’ only failure was following Biden. She was charismatic, decent, smart, young, etc. and had basically normal policy ideas.

She ran on Biden policy, who ran on Obama policy, which was also the same as both Clintons.

And they were all running against Trump’s drink bleach and commit fraud, treason, and rape policy.

My best guess is that Trump won because he wasn’t Obama. Then Biden won because he wasn’t Trump. Then Trump won because he wasn’t Biden. Basically, Americans are so polarized now that the sitting party doesn’t stand a chance. The incumbency advantage has flipped now. And there is no possibly way anyone could be widely popular.

The fundamental challenge Harris would have needed to overcome in a normal presidential election is the biases voters might have regarding her plumbing and skin color.

She also, of course, had additional challenges with how she ended up on the ballot, and disgruntlement (and myopia) among some voters in some states with how the Dem leadership in general was failing to adopt/advance their priorities…and she was running against a political machine that was remarkably skilled in exploiting all of those biases and challenges.

1 Like

Obama already showed that you can overcome racial prejudice.

Can’t say for the plumbing. You’d think more women who would want to see a woman president in their lifetime than (re-)elect a male rapist, but who knows.

Certainly I’d agree that starting with the Biden ballot was a massive strategic clusterfuck. Theoretically, it should have been evidence that actually we shouldn’t elect old men, but obviously that’s a level of rationality we lack.

Clinton and Harris rans as female candidates rather than candidates that happened to be female.

Obama ran as a candidate that happened to be black. He occasionally showed up as a black president, rather than a president that was black, and people reliably lost their minds over that. Treyvon Martin, for example.