If your erection lasts for more than 24 hours, call your friends and brag about it.
IFYP
Iāll go with the simpler, more conceptual approach: just spend more on political lobbying than the pharmaceutical industry. The best ideas and necessary legislation will follow. Haha, just kidding guys. Spending more than them on lobbying isnāt realistic, is it?
This should be a non-paywalled link.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/inflation-reduction-drug-prices-11673628922?st=jqamczbhuw9fhfd&reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink
This is somewhat predictable, but I suspect a few folks didnāt consider these unintended consequences.
The article also mentions that doses of Pfizer and Moderna are expected to be $110-$130/dose in the US once the current government contracts expire (up from $30ish/dose).
First shoe to drop due to the Inflation Reduction Actās new regulations on pharmaceutical pricing.
Obesity injections seem to be working (somewhat) now.
They cost $1k/month.
30% of old people are obese.
Should we give them $1k/month?
If they get the injections, then they can eat $1K/month of more food. Thatās good for the economy, right? I think thatās how it works.
I say we should wait and see what European countries do. I expect that IF they approve the drugs for their systems, they wonāt be paying $1,000/month.
from article: āā¦adding that more research is needed to know whether weight loss induced by these drugs translates to better long-term health outcomes.ā
This.
Agree, the government could really use a test and learn function.
In phrarma news, J&J randomly decided to allow a company to produce generic Bedaquiline, their TB drug. The Bedaquiline patent was supposed to expire right now anyway, but J&J had created secondary patents to keep it going for a couple more years. Which would have kept the cost up in a lot of countries that canāt afford it.
This met with complaining from Doctors Without Borders, and Stop TB, and culminated recently in a John Green you-tube rant.
(J&Jās deal to allow a generics came the day after that rant, but probably not due to the rant, as it takes time to make deals.)
Anyway, an interesting little saga imo. And pretty well articulates one aspect of the nonsense of the industry.
will be interesting to see if/how this survives legal challenges. or interacts with proposed tariffs (depending where the drug is made). as a premise, it is the sort of thing some people have cheered for
Iām one of those people. Iād like to see Congress pass a law that caps drug prices in the US (for all purchases) at 110% of the average price paid in other rich countries.
Trump mentioned this in he last term, and maybe signed an EO very late, but nothing came of it.
I think that early on in his first term he had a meeting with drug CEOs that didnāt seem to have any effect.
IIRC, Biden felt he had the power to work on the prices Medicare pays. I donāt know how far a president can go without Congress.
The only thing this really means is that the Pharma companies are going to throw hundreds of millions of $$ at the mid-terms to get their own people elected.
And then Trump is DOA. Like last time.
It failed legal challenges in 2020. It may be judge dependent, but surely pharma company lawyers understand judge shopping.
I do wonder who shorted these stocks before Trump came out with his comment.
I would like to see lower pharma prices.
But, if I had a choice between lower pharma prices vs. the Rs losing the midterms by hefty margins, Iāll take the latter.
Other countries had no problem introducing similar caps but they donāt have powerful pharma lobbies.