Can a private citizen establish a non-state sponsored religion called “Church of the United States”?
I’m just wondering because I think people would balk at such an idea since the name sounds state-sponsored, even when it’s not. But if one were to prohibit a person from creating such a church, on what grounds would they be able to do so? The government can’t claim a trademark since well, they don’t have a church that’s called “Church of the United States” which itself would be in violation of the First Amendment.
Not sure what you’re getting at given that the “separation of church and state” prevents any form of “state sponsorship” of any religion.
And the name of a religion isn’t constrained by anything in the Constitution . . . nor any laws that I’m aware of.
And the Constitution constrains the government, not “private entities” (whether or not they’re citizens).
Ok what if you created a non-official, non-state-sponsored religion called, “The Official Church of the United States”, would that be okay?
Not sure what you’ve done to change things.
I imagine there’s a path for you getting sued for misrepresentation. People who rely on the name as a representation of your identity and subsequently donate money have potentially been defrauded.
1 Like
nah no donations accepted, the charter will clearly state that the church has no affiliation with the US Government and whose sole existence is to answer the question as to whether it can be called “Church of the United States”.
it isn’t a church if it isn’t attempting to maximize the tax exempt loophole as it pursues it’s existence to answer…anything
Go for it - state sponsored religion is not allowed, but no one said religion sponsored state is prohibited