Yeah, I found those when I went searching. But having the public discipline announcements scattered across countless Actuarial Reviews is less than ideal. It’s technically public discipline – not quite as bad as putting all the planning charts and demolition orders on display at the local planning department in Alpha Centauri, but not what I would call transparent.
Or possibly changing results. Do we know if the data accessed was read-only?
Yeah, that’s how it used to be done for the SOA/AAA in the pre-internet age. It was a notice in whatever the main publication for the org was.
It is helpful when there’s a single page, in case a non-actuary needed to go look something like this up.
If a candidate could see someone else’s grades and change them, the CAS might as well close up shop and give a letter of complete unconditional surrender to the SOA.
1 Like
What if the hack was perpetuated by the SOA?
The first draft of such a letter was written a few years ago, remember? I doubt you can still find a link to it in the CAS website, though.
SOA Secure
2 Likes
My point stands x infinity.
1 Like
I can confirm access was read-only. Basically those people gained access to their official .pdf grade sheet early. Not some hacking of the databases with actual information being stored.
That’s good to hear
Holy 
!!! This really happened??? I gotta see the final report!!! 
Anybody hear what was in the final report?