4 doesn’t seem harder 
lolol
- Guess A:B (guesser)
- 2468 1:2 (Celalta)
- 6128 0:2 (Celalta)
- 3482 2:0 (Celalta)
5486
Guess A:B (guesser)
2468 1:2 (Celalta)
6128 0:2 (Celalta)
3482 2:0 (Celalta)
5486 3:0 (John.S.Mill)
7486
and then 9486 if that’s incorrect
yeah this does seem easier.
6 digit next!!
oh and 0486 after
1 Like
Could try doing repeating digits to make it more difficult.
actually, what if the number of digits is hidden 
yeah true
0486 suckas
Technically the 8th guess, in case anyone’s counting.
7th, right?
5486 is 4th, then 3 more to get to 0486 makes 7?
I like the messed up idea of not stating how many digits, but how does that work in scoring? I guess you could figure it out if I decided on a 4 digit number, and there was a score 4:1, you’d have to drop the last digit, but hopefully you would have caught on before then. Is there a limit on digits? Between 4 and 6?
Not sure I follow this.
I’m thinking A will be aligned from left to right, whereas B will be reported as is.
So if the number is 1234
and you guess 234, the score would be 0:3.
If the number is 234, and you guess 1234, the score would be 0:3 as well.
Are there any other complications?
I was thinking digits can be anything from 1-5 for a test run.
I’ll wait to hear about any more concerns before I come up with a number
I mean if my number was 1234 and the guess was 12345, the score would be 4:1 (which is an impossible score for a 5 digit number, but is a possible score for a 4 digit number… oh, NM, I just realized the issue. I should have said 4:0 to start).
Fixing my example:
4:1 is an impossible score for both a 4 digit number (A+B equal at max 4) and a 5 digit number (you can’t have 4 in the correct place and a correct digit in the wrong place), but it is a possible score for a 6 digit number (the 6th number not being guessed in 12345).
Yup. Agree.
I have a number (# of digits unknown 1:5, each digit 0:9, no repeats).
I do what I want.
1 Like
51627
- 51627 Kerfluffles 1:0
03489